Mansion at nightModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mansion at nighthttp://gallery.netmagi.com/misc/DSC_2121b
The sign isn't lit. I tried flashing the foreground to see what it would look like and the paint on the sign turned out to be reflective! It's shot with the kit lens, on-board flash and manual exposure (shutter was around 15 seconds). B&W was done in photoshop and it's crop'd a bit. I'm a total n00b looking for opinions, do please don't hold back. -Rich
Rich - you may be, as you say a noob, but I like your shot. Obviously the major problem with any shot like this is shadows. If you are keen on PP you could take the shadows out to make a cleaner shot.
Keep em coming Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Rich
Interesting shot. Where is this place? Also might be worth putting your location in your profile. Edit: Just had a look at the rest of your gallery and was taken with this shot - Care to say how it was done? http://gallery.netmagi.com/misc/DSC_1275 Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I've tried similar things with 'ghostly' images but none turned out quite as good as this one.
Add me to the list of people who's curiosity is growing.... I liked the mansion shot but felt you may have tried to include too much in the frame. Perhaps a tighter angle or more singled-out feature might have improved it. (Just another noob's opinion!) Simon. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Here's the relevant exif on the "ghostly" image:
http://gallery.netmagi.com/misc/DSC_1275 Flash used : No Focal length : 18.0mm Exposure time : 30.000 s Aperture : f/13.0 and, here's how it went: 1) I opened the shutter with the room in total darkness 2) I flicked the room light on for half a second or so to lightly expose the couch and surroundings 3) I had my son run in and sit down in the center of the couch and hold perfectly still while I "painted him in with a flashlight" (I read about this light-painting technique on someone's webpage, can't find the URL now) 4) repeat step 3 for the second two positions having him move in total darkness and sit still when I used the flashlight This shot has no PP. It's straight from the cam, and could probably use some WB work in the least, but I wanted to leave it completely as-is so ppl didn't think any of the "ghost" effect came from the PP. -Rich
Thanks for pointing that out. The Mansion and where I make my home is Jim Thorpe, PA Here's a shot I took of the town with an older digicam years ago: http://www.the-grandview.com/images/jt_ ... gstaff.jpg You can see the mansion from the previous shot in the center area of this larger pic. -Rich
I like the mansion shot but I don't think the sign in the lower right adds to it, but detracts from it a little. I would like to see this up closer maybe, from a steep angle, not quite including teh entire mansion, but close, and maybe the frame tilted a little. basically what Simon said.
I've added a post-processed version of the ghosty couch one. WB is fixed, mis-exposed areas fixed, and it's crop'd:
http://gallery.netmagi.com/misc/DSC_1275b The original is still there too. -Rich
It's owned by a local non-profit group, and is open for tours etc., but I suppose I could offer the image to them if they wanted to display it with my name included. . or is this a bad idea? -Rich
I think it is a good idea. I think that that photo is a nice piece of work, and I think that they would probably be quite happy to hang it on the wall. Add your name to the bottom LH corner, have it printed 10x8 or larger, and perhaps even donate it seeing as it is a not for profit organisation. Just an idea - the sort of thing that i would do. I tend to give prints away more often than I sell them. I enjoy photography and do not plan on making a living from it. Besides, I enjoy the reaction that I get from people when I give them something that they may enjoy.
If they wanted to use it for promotional work, you could work something out. Even if it just stipulated that credit is given. BTW, it was the sign that made me think about the photo being used in such a way. Cheers Matt
rich,
sorry to be moving away from the main picture you posted but i really like the "ghost" image you took. well done. thanks for the advice on how it was achieved. think i might have to give it a go tonight. just a personal opinion, but i like the original image more. the dark shadows add to the effect. dave.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|