Crossroads

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Crossroads

Postby Hyena on Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:30 pm

Hey guys

While driving across the Nevada desert in the middle of nowhere I came across these train tracks that I thought could do with being photographed :)
I hadn't seen another car for half an hour, but believe it or not when I got out of the car and went for a walk to find the best angles I actually found 2 other photogs there taking pics too! (cloned them out of the 2nd image)


Image

Image

Image

I have to pick one for the honeymoon album, I think I like the first one the most but I'm curious as to what others think of the other 2

Cheers
Last edited by Hyena on Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:34 pm

Jay I like 2 & 3, two shows how desolate it is and highlights the long train. I also like the leading lines of 2 & 3
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby sheepie on Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:16 pm

The perspective of #3 makes this the pick for me, and the treatment you've given it works nicely too :)

I am bothered by a couple of points in the other two...

1st. You've chosen to cut the top off the signals, and the train disappears off the edge of the picture. One of these on it's own may have been ok, but both in the same picture makes me wonder what the picture is actually of. I think this image would have been much stronger if you had managed to get the train on the same part of the tracks you are on (travelling towards you preferably). Either that, or a different view to show the whole of the signal - at least to the top of the railroad sign part.

2nd. Seems out of balance to me. Again, the train is off the edge of the picture, which makes me want to follow it. This is not helped by the line going down the left side of the image. The position of the train, coupled (excuse the pun) with the perspective of the last pic, would have worked nicely.
Something you could try which I just spotted, is a crop at the base of the hills in the background (so they don't show at all) - if you also take off a bit at the bottom (so the crossing doesn't show) - I think that may help show the sparseness.

I know you can't go back and reshoot these, so my comments aren't much use to you in this case - but hopefully they provide a bit of a spark to discussion / something to think about next time :) Either way, they are still your memories, not mine, and they are yours to enjoy :)

(And, of course, I guarantee others will have the exact opposite view from what I've said ;) )
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby norbs on Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:21 pm

The last one of the three is great in B&W.

You should have waited on the 1st 2 for the train to be a bit closer. :)

Nice shots.
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:37 pm

#1 - Half a train, half a crossing sign.. like Leon, I'd of rather a full something, as I'm torn between each and it reduces the impact of the shot

#2 I think I prefer the second without the train or croped to remove it.. in this shot the leading lines lead me to the lovely mountain range, I find the train distracting.

#3 Favourite shot of the set, Nice lines, nice B&W treatment but the shed looks like it's going to fall down (maybe it was) ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:01 pm

#3 Is a cracker....i love the pano crop and the colours or lack off make the shot!

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Hyena on Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:00 pm

Thanks for the comments guys :)
Sheepie, Alpha 7, I see what you mean about the sign and the train. The top of the sign was actually quite high and if I got back far enough to get that in I also got an ugly guard rail and some of the road in at the bottom (which I suppose I could have cropped out later...)
Waiting for the train to pass wasn't an option unfortunately. You can see the distance it moved from the 1st to the 2nd shot - that was nearly 5 minutes. The rest of the carriages extended almost as long again out off to the left of the shot! Had I have been on my own I would have hung around and got some shots of the train as it passed and had the perspective of all the carriages on the straight, but the new wife wasn't too keen on sitting in the car in the middle of the desert while I took photos :lol:

How about these 2 shots with the train cloned out ?
Does the first one look any better with the sign cropped out and only the signals showing ?

Image

Image
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby Raskill on Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:05 am

Nice pics mate. I would go for the last image:

Image

I think it has a nice feeling of desolation and loniless, sort of like marriage really.... :lol: :wink: Of course, I joke....

Seriously, I think it portrays the lonely desert feeling better than the others.

It always amazes me where members travel to. I must have the most boring life here!

Well done!
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby Mr Darcy on Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:27 am

I like #3 in the first set.
#2 in the second set works for me. I find the signals add to the feeling of isolation, BUT I feel like I'm sliding off the RHS. I think it is the base of the mountains doing it. The boom arm is vertical & the skyline is approx horizontal, but the base of the mountains is sloping, so I read that as the horizon, and get the tilt.
#3 second set also works for me, but it didn't on first glance. One to come back to I think, & therefore possibly the best. (Does that make sense?)
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:22 am

Last image in improved in my opinion, and I agree with Mr Darcy that the first in the second set is probably too tilted.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:16 pm

I personally like the counterpoint of the signal in the second set, #1 :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques