



Do they work better in BW or colours??
C&C Welcomed

Vintage - All In LineModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Vintage - All In LineThese vintage cars got attention to many pedestrians around the bridge last weekend. It was hard to get a 'clean' shot without having getting anyone in view. So I have to zoom in tight.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Do they work better in BW or colours?? C&C Welcomed ![]()
They all looks awesome. My fav has got to be the last one, so to answer your question- The B&W.
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
All good Yip - I like #2 the most here. Very nice.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
last two are very nifty clean and smart
excellent work the first one however looks ordinary compared to the rest probably the dull overcast conditions has something to do with it
Love #3 - it's crispness compelled me to linger and really explore the fine detail - from actually counting the fins to the reflection in the headlight (can I make out the photographer taking the shot ? or just have vivid imagination?)
Love the way you mounted it very complimentary - can also see commercial appeal from prints to greeting cards. Was this cropped or shot as is ? DebT ![]()
I thought the first one was great, but then I saw the other two
![]() Awesome stuff. P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Yip
#3 for me too. Nice B & W conversion also. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Yip
the last one is special, I love the contrast and crispness of the shot and I think it would look good as a LARGE print on any wall
Thanks all for the generous comments
![]() I too think about printing the last two shots. ![]()
They were all shot as is, no cropping applied except for the 'framing' part on PP.
The last one for me as well............nice and sharp all the shots, and cool DOF.
Well done...... Dan
wow. number 3 is excellent. the tones are very good...top notch.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Elegant set Yi-P. I also favour #3 and agree with Glen with the gutter number clone out. Perhaps even the dried leaves in the gutter to complete the cleanup before printing. I'm sure the owner would love such a print.
cheers marco
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|