The duals when dad is not looking.
I will say the kid actually took a better picture


C&C Welcomed
Quick! Dad is not looking!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Quick! Dad is not looking!I found this on the weekend, very cute IMO
The duals when dad is not looking. I will say the kid actually took a better picture ![]() ![]() C&C Welcomed
That's a pretty damn nice combo she has there. Might want to adjust your curves a bit to give it a bit more contrast. Love the angle, but just lacks a bit of depth.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Great photo - I like how the kid is actually using the viewfinder instead of the LCD.
P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Go the 1D (x) and 24-70
![]() Agree re: Color, needs a bit more OOMPH! 5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
Thanks,
Here is the PP corrected version with stronger curves: ![]() Yup, she was using a 1Ds MkII + 24-70 and another 5D + 70-200 on her neck. You can probably see the little grey thing hanging in front of her.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|