OUch - high iso .....
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:10 pm
She hates the flash, so tried upping the iso ...
boy the D70 is noisy
She hates the flash, so tried upping the iso ...
boy the D70 is noisy
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://www.dslrusers.net/
OUch - high iso .....
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:10 pm
She hates the flash, so tried upping the iso ...
boy the D70 is noisy
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:16 pmwhat ISO are these?
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:19 pmOops - sorry ....
first one iso 1000, 1/200 @ f3.2
second iso 1600, 1/100 @ f3.8
ran through noise reduction to help a little
first one iso 1000, 1/200 @ f3.2
second iso 1600, 1/100 @ f3.8
ran through noise reduction to help a little
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:56 pmwelcome to my world
nice shots cats hate flash my furball never allows me to take a proper shot
nice shots cats hate flash my furball never allows me to take a proper shot
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:59 pmNice. Love how the eyes contrast with the fur.
Alex
Alex
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:56 amHonestly, I was so drawn to the eyes in #1 I didn't notice the noise until I read the text.
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:34 pmThe d70 was a bastard to shoot gigs with. Over iso1000 and the noise was a real problem, however i needed iso1600 dueto the crappy lighting. I find the d200 is really good at 1600, no canon but still really good and easy to manage the noise.
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:00 pmYes, there is some noise, but a good shot is a good shot. Compare this to ISO1600 colour film, or ISO400 slide film... 
Cheers
Steffen.
Cheers
Steffen.
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:45 pmThe first image is magnificent....those eyes really make the shot ! The selective DOF on the face is well done.
No. 2, I feel, is let down by not enough DOF. The nose is "just" OOF , leaving the hair on the bridge of the nose in focus. IMO, it would have been a better image if the nose/nostril had been in focus.
Although the high ISO looks quite bad on-screen, printed out, the image shouldn't look too bad.
I guess it comes down to what the image is intended for (if anything).
But as steffen said, "a good shot is a good shot"....and it's better to get that shot (with noise) than not have that shot at all. PS..what lens were you using ?
No. 2, I feel, is let down by not enough DOF. The nose is "just" OOF , leaving the hair on the bridge of the nose in focus. IMO, it would have been a better image if the nose/nostril had been in focus.
Although the high ISO looks quite bad on-screen, printed out, the image shouldn't look too bad.
I guess it comes down to what the image is intended for (if anything).
But as steffen said, "a good shot is a good shot"....and it's better to get that shot (with noise) than not have that shot at all. PS..what lens were you using ?
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:38 pmThanks everyone
Really appreciate the feedback - I don't usually shoot at high iso, but thought it was about time I tried it 
Bloody hard LOL
The shot was taken with the old trusty 105 2.8 micro
Really appreciate the feedback - I don't usually shoot at high iso, but thought it was about time I tried it
Bloody hard LOL
The shot was taken with the old trusty 105 2.8 micro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:21 pmAs always - love your work.
The first shot may look terrific cropped as a portrait shot - getting rid of the background. The eyes just do it for me with this shot.
Cheers, Mick
The first shot may look terrific cropped as a portrait shot - getting rid of the background. The eyes just do it for me with this shot.
Cheers, Mick