Playing with Adobe lightroom

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Playing with Adobe lightroom

Postby firsty on Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:06 pm

As I will be getting a copy of lightroom at no cost because they brought out the makers of rawshooter pro that I purchased last year, I thought I better start getting to know it.
So I have been playing with the beta, I have imported all my photos since last July and spent time key wording them and having a look at the editing tools.
To say I'm happy with program is an understatement.
I have had a look at all the improvements they have made for the first release and I think anyone would be happy (a quick search will bring up lots of video tutorial of both the betas and the final release)

here are a few photos that I have had a play with while I was key wording
they were exported at this size from Lightroom as jpegs and then lightly sharpened and border add in photoshop, so the quality would be higher exported as a full size tiff then edited in photoshop but these are great as is for the web

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
firsty
Senior Member
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200

Postby daniel_r on Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 pm

Keith, #2 and #4 are quite fine images.

Looks like #4 has been hit by a bit of tonal clipping in converting it for the web, but I reckon the original 16bit pre-web version would be superb.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby Yi-P on Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:50 pm

#2 is great shot :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby colin_12 on Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:49 pm

These are all good in my book Keith. I like the style of shot in #2.
Might have to have a look at this program.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby DaveB on Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm

They're all great Keith.

If you like Beta 4.1, I think you're going to love 1.0! It still has lots of things to be improved in the future but as it is, it's already taken over as the core of my image processing.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Pehpsi on Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:18 pm

love #2, great tones in #4, and you've nearly convinced me to try Lightroom..
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby devilla101 on Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:05 pm

Number 2 and 4

What can I say but WOW :shock:

These are some top pics. Can I ask what equipment you were using?
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Postby firsty on Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:25 pm

devilla101 wrote:These are some top pics. Can I ask what equipment you were using?

thanks for that devilla, I'm learning to use a Nikon D200 and the first 2 were with a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the last 2 with Tokina 12-24 f4

DaveB
I have had a look at ALL the videos on the net and the things they have improved over the beta look real good
my main gripe was there was no snapshot so you had to export then start again if you wanted different versions and I realy like how I can find any photo real fast now :)
User avatar
firsty
Senior Member
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200

Postby DaveB on Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:22 pm

firsty wrote:I realy like how I can find any photo real fast now :)

It's pretty good like that, although not quite in the real of iView MediaPro. For instance there are a few extra fields it would occasionally be useful to search on, but I expect many of those loose ends will be tidied up for 1.1 and it's pretty good at 1.0.

Keep in mind when you start using it that it is a 1.0 product (even with the public betas behind it) and you'll probably find a few things you'd like to work differently. It may be something no-one else has noticed before but even if it is, it's worth mentioning to Adobe so they can schedule the work to change things. The public and private betas have helped guide the development of the product, but if you know anything about software development you'll know that there's always more to do.
While I'm sure we didn't catch everything, there's a long list of changes and fixes that Adobe has been working on. Some of them didn't make the cut for 1.0 and I'm told are scheduled for "1.1" (whenever that will be) and there others I haven't heard the status on of course.

Meanwhile, enjoy! Only about a week to go until 1.0 is available to the public...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Lukaszek on Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:48 pm

2 and 4 are excellent. I will wait for release full trial version to check it out.
Nikon D300s + Nikon D70s + 18-70 Kit Lens + Tamron Macro 90mm f2.8 + Nikkor 80-200 mm f/4.5-5.6 D + SB800 + Benro C297 & KB2
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lukaszek
User avatar
Lukaszek
Member
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Camperdown, Sydney

Postby Wocka on Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:52 am

Keith,

All images are nice.

I'm in the same boat, waiting for the release of LR and I should also get a free copy as part of the RawShooter purchase. Although I haven't played with any of the LR Beta releases.
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Postby lukeo on Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:44 pm

In my opinion 2 and 4 are simply stunning! Number 3 looks underexposed to me? My monitor is calibrated, could just be my eyes I guess. Thanks for sharing!

Just a quick thing, I know this thread is supposed to be about Lightroom but I'm not seeing it? These seem to me to be your standard 4 image maximum post showing off some great shots? Any before and after links you could post up? Or even a walk thru of some features you find better/faster etc than Photoshop perhaps?
D70, Sigma 10-20mm, 28-70 F2.8 EX, 70-200mm F2.8 EX, Nikon 50mm AFD, http://lukeo.fotopic.net/
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques