Got to shoot some stills for a little indy flick due out next year. Here are the results. (dificult shoot as lighting was low as possible). Think Sopranos meets Cheers!
Dan




Cheers (part two coming)
Movie Stills PhotographyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Movie Stills PhotographyHey all,
Got to shoot some stills for a little indy flick due out next year. Here are the results. (dificult shoot as lighting was low as possible). Think Sopranos meets Cheers! Dan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers (part two coming)
I'd say your second is the best.
But the others don't really have much of an interest. The first is soft and the PP doesn't really save it at all, which is a shame since it looks like it could be a good image even with not-so-impressive composition. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thanks for the comments (bar the first reply - which i dont think was extremely helpful at all - i am not reinventing the wheel with movie stills here, and its my first attempt, and i have many better shots).
Cheers dan
you made the actress look great in image 2, quite a nostalgic image
is the softfocus effect done in photoshop or is it an optical effect? but i think the 1st one is more intruiging somehow just need to watch that framing it would look better if the guy was slightly framed a little bit more to the right
Second photo is ace with the soft and dreamy look. I think the first pic would benefit as a portrait shot rather than landscape.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|