

cheers zsolt
the roseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
hi zeddy bit dificult to see with the small image size.can you post them bigger,800 biggest side would be good.
cheers pa
Zeddy
Some digital cameras, the D70 included, tend to oversaturate reds. Your roses look a little oversaturated on my monitor. It took me awhile to figure out that I needed to underexpose deep red subjects by about a stop to prevent them from 'blocking up'. You might like to retry the shots and underexpose a little. Then pump up the brightness in Photoshop. Cheers Regards
Matt. K
My thoughts would be to go with the unflashed version and work the Levels and Curves adjustment layers somewhat and maybe just a tad of adjustment in Hue & Saturation then if needed. Good potential here though.
Col Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
Yes, the red channel seems to be 'clipped' up on the overexposed side.
If you shot RAW and have NC, you can drag the red 'chroma' down by one or two stops and it may save you from this disaster. It is a nice picture, but only need some tuning to get it shining!!
Like MattK says, the reds are overdone. the D200 has the same problem. I've been trying to get a decent photo of some of my cherry crop, and found that underexposing is the only way to get close to real colour, but even then I cant seem to get it quite right... the redder cherries look almost luminous, although the darker coloured ones are more realistic.
D70, D200, CP5700
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|