It's not about the girl
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:56 amQuote of the day from NNNNNsic....
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://www.dslrusers.net/
It's not about the girl
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:56 amPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:59 amNow...would you actually believe we were discussing lighting techniques of this shot? The fact that it was a photo of Megan Gale has NOTHING to do with it
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:45 amSee, I would have used the excuse that it is one of those revolving advertisements, and it had just changed over from an ad for the Nikon D3h!
P
P
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:49 amReschsmooth wrote:See, I would have used the excuse that it is one of those revolving advertisements, and it had just changed over from an ad for the Nikon D3h!
P
Clever
BUT...we WERE talking about the lighting technique!!
Yi-p?
Leigh??
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:56 amThat's called 'validation' Geoff, a technique used by people when they are trying to convince themselves I presume you all thought it was great lighting? 
P
I presume you all thought it was great lighting?
P
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:25 amis that an 18-200 VR at full extension I see you holding Geoff???
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:28 amJustin
That image is terribly distorted. What lens was it?
That image is terribly distorted. What lens was it?
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:41 amSigma 12-24 at wide pre-Dxo
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:44 amGeoff,
I don't know if it's just the wind blowing your jumper or if your happy to see Megan?
I don't know if it's just the wind blowing your jumper or if your happy to see Megan?
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:21 pmWocka wrote:I don't know if it's just the wind blowing your jumper or if your happy to see Megan?
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:30 pmIt was the wind, but who's gonna believe me? 
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:32 pmThere was a photo in the paper about a year ago which was a great capture of an unfortunate moment (for some anyway), when, I think, Megan Gale had just become the 'face' of DJs - it was a photo of Ms Gale walking through a DJs shop and right behind her was the CEO of DJs. Nothing spectularly except the image was taken just as the CEO's eyes had wandered down to her, ummm, lower torso!
I am sure he would have had some explaining to do if his wife saw the pic.
P
I am sure he would have had some explaining to do if his wife saw the pic.
P
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:14 pmAnyone notice the positioning and length of the lenses? 
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:42 pmif this is what you use your slr for then you should consider giving it away.... give to me
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:20 pmIt was the light, it was the picture, certainly wasnt the girl who had our long lenses out....