Anyhow... I miss posting images so thought I'd submit this one from a few weeks ago.

What do you think of the composition?
Could've used a little more DOF I think.
Paul
Tawny FrogmouthModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tawny FrogmouthWell my photography drought still continues... but hopefully that will all change tomorrow.
Anyhow... I miss posting images so thought I'd submit this one from a few weeks ago. ![]() What do you think of the composition? Could've used a little more DOF I think. Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
i like that the composition is different to the norm.. but the dof kills the shot slightly imho.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Yeah I should have upped the ISO to get more DOF (was at 1/60, f4 on the 500mm ... pushing it to say the least!!)
Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
nice frogmouth.
I saw a pair the other week but didnt have the camera. I like this sTeve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Nice shot Paul. Maybe worth cropping a bit off the top (of the OOF part not the frogmouth). I got a shot of a similar looking bird in Northern Tassie the other day. And I've seen them in Brisbane too. These guys seem to be all over Aus.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Hi Paul,
I like this image just the way it is. Depth of Field is not a worry.... the detail in the bird is rather subtle and so to have more detail in the upper half of the picture is only going to create a visual confilict and the bird is going to be the loser. The amount of height that you have in the image is also important... by having the height you actually make the bird appear more squat... it is a good effect in this image. My advice... dont touch it. Well done.
I think Mr or Mrs Frogmouth is ultra cool.
![]() A bit more DOF next time will turn this from ultra cool into superb. ![]() Cheers, CD
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|