

Take TwoModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Take TwoI've been taking a few more images of my forever willing bro in law and this is one that I wanted to put up here for a stringent critique..i.e rip it apart of u must! This was taken with the 17-55DX 2.8 with the SB-800 in remote mode. I had a very light blue piece of paper over the flash to create a pre-pp cooler feeling. It has lost a bit of punch with the resize for web. Be keen on your thoughts on this one. If I were self critiquing I'd say that the shadow of the hat is a little distracting and the height of Fred's jumper does lose his neck somewhat. Apart from that I found it quite a pensive shot, and I just love photographing him. Appreciate your comments, good or bad
![]() ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I would be moving him further from the background , that will take care of the shadow.
I think also a little less flash maybe. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Probably should have used a higher shutter speed and maybe bounce the flash off that back wall - and make him sit maybe perpendicular to the wall.
Noticed in your exif that you had the shutter speed at 1/60, which might be why the shot wasn't too sharp. Creating a cooler cast photo can be adjusted later on if you shot with Raw. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Geoff,
what about using the 70-200VR @ 70mm ? I think his shnozzel looks a bit large ? ![]() Also I'd suggest desaturating BUT keep the blue eyes and sharpen them a bit more. Regards, CD
Thanks guys for the comments thus far.
Piro - I was shooting in AP and wanted to get a minimal DOF (no OOF background) - yes not hard with a plain background - will investigate more with a higher shutterspeed next time he's here... This wasn't too posed so setting him up physically beforehand didn't really come to mind - he just sits there and I kinda work around him/with him. It was also a tad sharper in the original Yi-p A B&W I have done: ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|