Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by robster on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:26 am
Hi all,
I thought I'd ask for some feedback. There were a tonne of images, but here are a few examples. These were shot in colour on a 20D and all worked on a bit in potatoshop.
It was my first go with the camera. All done indoors one Saturday at our hair salon.
Rob
(I have very thick skin, and I want to become VERY good at this so feel free to rip em!  )

-

robster
- Member
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:58 pm
- Location: Pomona, Sunshine Coast, QLD (Canon EOS30D)
by gstark on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:34 am
Rob,
Interesting images. The lighting especially - #2 for instance - you have the primary light on the back of the model's head, and his face in shadow but you've retained detail in his face while not blowing the highlights.
Good work.
As a general rule, I'm not overly fond of portraits being shot in landscape mode - think about why portrait mode is so named  . That said, your use of negative space here is effective, and these images don't suffer too much IMHO from this "ailment".
But I'd like to see more work done on the B&W conversion. These are not, to me, B&W images; they're soft greys, rather than B&W. Can you show me really sold black in any of them?
No, not really. But B&W needs to enjoy a full range of shading, from a full on, rich deep black, to a pure white.
Play with the conversion a little more, and see what you can come up with.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by optogamut on Tue Jul 04, 2006 11:35 am
What Gary said! Need some black, they're just too flat.
I like #3 best. #2 has some funny little highlights on the models face I'd try to avoid next time and being centered in the composition doesn't work, where #3 uses the negative space with more effect.
- Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,....
"Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
-

optogamut
- Member
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:28 pm
- Location: Woodford, NSW
-
by robster on Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:50 pm
Yes, my fave is 3 for the white space usage, but I like 1 as it's the 'blackest' of the lot.
I remember when we did these the issue we had was it's a 'hair shoot' and as we took the blacks down to black we lost detail in the hair. This is a real issue so we had to pull it back.
I guess this comes down to my skill at photoshop. Does anyone have any pointers as to how you can take the black down and still maintain detail in the hair?
-

robster
- Member
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:58 pm
- Location: Pomona, Sunshine Coast, QLD (Canon EOS30D)
by graphite on Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:16 pm
The only thing I can suggest for photoshop, is to play around with either the curves, or the levels. not that I know what I am doing, but those are the two areas where I tend to mess with B&W.
Of course if someone who actually knows their stuff suggests anything, then my advice would be to ignore me. 
-
graphite
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:58 am
- Location: Jannali - NSW Nikon D50
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|