Page 1 of 1

Dock at Dusk

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:28 pm
by pharmer
Taken at Pier 35, Port Melbourne this evening

Image

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:29 pm
by daniel_r
awesome clouds and a great use of the WA perspective!

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:33 pm
by marcotrov
Beautifully crafted image Barrie. You have used the glorious afternoon/morning light to great effect with the whole scene punctuated with the terrific cloud formations. The whole scene sits well together.
cheers
marco

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:35 pm
by Slider
Brilliant Barrie. Love it. Postcard material :D

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:49 pm
by macka
Barrie,

Your threads never disappoint. Lovely shot. Colours are great.

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:50 pm
by rooboy
You need to stop posting images like this, they're causing severe lust for wide angle lenses :P

Simply fantastic shot, gorgeous colours in the sky and afternoon light, and great use of the wide angle :D. Absolutely love it

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:19 pm
by pharmer
rooboy wrote:You need to stop posting images like this, they're causing severe lust for wide angle lenses :P


Yeah I know - get one :)

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:23 pm
by Laurie
EXIF Data?
what Lens did you use for this shot?

very nice shot, love the shadows and light.

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:24 pm
by losfp
Ahh.. wide angle :)

I just mentioned it in another thread, but this is my favourite photo-taking time... though perhaps a bit later than the other thread. This one is that magic 15 minutes every day - normally the 15 minutes when I am anywhere but somewhere where my camera is ;)

Nicely done!! Beautifully timed too, the colours and reflections are perfect. I might have exposed the sky a bit darker, but otherwise it is all good!!

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:30 pm
by pharmer
Teh_Fonz wrote:EXIF Data?
what Lens did you use for this shot?

very nice shot, love the shadows and light.


Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm

Exposure Time: 1/40 sec
F-Number: f/5.6
Exposure Program: Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating: 320
Lens Aperture: f/5.6
Exposure Bias: 0.3 EV
Metering Mode: Pattern
Light Source: Cloudy Weather
Flash: No Flash
Focal Length: 10.00 mm
White Balance: Manual
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Gain Control: None
Contrast: Normal
Saturation: High
Sharpness: Hard

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:54 pm
by Laurie
pharmer wrote:
Teh_Fonz wrote:EXIF Data?
what Lens did you use for this shot?

very nice shot, love the shadows and light.


Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm

Exposure Time: 1/40 sec
F-Number: f/5.6
Exposure Program: Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating: 320
Lens Aperture: f/5.6
Exposure Bias: 0.3 EV
Metering Mode: Pattern
Light Source: Cloudy Weather
Flash: No Flash
Focal Length: 10.00 mm
White Balance: Manual
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Gain Control: None
Contrast: Normal
Saturation: High
Sharpness: Hard


Thanks. very nice. :)

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:33 am
by pharmer
Great clouds on this evening - Below is a shot of a palm tree that was near the dock

Image

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:56 am
by stubbsy
Barrie

I wasn't a big fan of the first shot, but the palm tree is superb. Great contrast in colour and tone between the orange/brown rough tree and the blue/grey fluffy clouds. Strong composition too.

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 10:38 am
by wmaburnett
i love the mellow colors and how they mix with the orange glow of the sun! well done!

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 11:07 am
by pharmer
stubbsy wrote:Barrie

I wasn't a big fan of the first shot, but the palm tree is superb. Great contrast in colour and tone between the orange/brown rough tree and the blue/grey fluffy clouds. Strong composition too.


Thanks Peter - any reason for not liking the first?

I would like some criticism :)

Its all helpful

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 11:30 am
by stubbsy
pharmer wrote:Thanks Peter - any reason for not liking the first?

I would like some criticism :)

Its all helpful

my Sony, Barrie. A couple of reasons the first image doesn't quite work for me

I find the distortion a bit distracting because it draws my eye very strongly to the rock wall and path in the lower right foreground, but the interest in the pic is elsewhere. This could be fixed by a pano crop just below the base of the bollard on the LHS

The whole image has a blue cast - the sky is too blue as are the presumably white hulls of the boat - I'd dial down the blue a touch, maybe even push the red slightly to warm the whole image. This would in turn give a nice sunset glow to the whole image. EDIT: I'd also reduce the saturation slightly.

Of course YMMV :wink:

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 11:45 am
by Mj
Barrie, I'd echo Peter's thoughts on your first shot, especially retifying the colour cast which is making for a fairly dull exposure. Whilst it would be worthwhile to play around with the composition with some cropping as Peter has suggested, my feeling is that the scene as a whole lacks any real focal interest... I'm really not sure what the subject or point of the picture is... just a snap of a location to me.

Bottom line for me is that you can do and have done better work IMHO.

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:18 pm
by pharmer
Thanks for all the opinions :)

Heres a closer crop, temperature cranked to 8500 Kelvin, bit darker and moodier

Image

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:36 pm
by stubbsy
That's better Barrie, although it now seems to have a slight yellow cast (too much blue reduction?)

Here's my take. Hope you don't mind. It's quick & dirty using Fireworks (no Photoshop @ work) and a touch too pink.

Image

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:42 pm
by pharmer
stubbsy wrote:That's better Barrie, although it now seems to have a slight yellow cast (too much blue reduction?)

Here's my take. Hope you don't mind. It's quick & dirty using Fireworks (no Photoshop @ work) and a touch too pink.

Image


Peter, its so subjective isn't it?- I like the yellow cast :D

Your take is almost as cold as my original, but pinker

I'd have to leave it and say I'm happy with both of mine :)

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:52 pm
by stubbsy
pharmer wrote:Peter, its so subjective isn't it?- I like the yellow cast :D

Your take is almost as cold as my original, but pinker

I'd have to leave it and say I'm happy with both of mine :)

Barrie - at the end of the day it's your image and the best treatment is what works for you. So far as my take, I agree I did a bad job of it - want me to remove my version?

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 1:06 pm
by pharmer
stubbsy wrote:
pharmer wrote:Peter, its so subjective isn't it?- I like the yellow cast :D

Your take is almost as cold as my original, but pinker

I'd have to leave it and say I'm happy with both of mine :)

Barrie - at the end of the day it's your image and the best treatment is what works for you. So far as my take, I agree I did a bad job of it - want me to remove my version?


Only if you want to :)

Leave it there for future thread readers - its educational :)

Cheers

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 1:08 pm
by stubbsy
Barrie, forgot to mention - I think the second version by you is a marked imrpovement - especially the recrop.