3 Takes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

3 Takes

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 01, 2006 12:17 am

When I'm at Darling Harbour there are two objects I've never been able to get the right angle on. One is the long wall with all the names on it, the other is the lighthouse. Well bugger me, but I got three of the lighthouse this weekend - now I can't decide which works best. What's a boy to do! Click a pic for a larger version.

Critique away - which works best for you?

#1 - I like the back lighting in this one
Image


#2 - I like the glow from the afternoon sun & the clouds in this one
Image


#3 - I like the bold colours in this one
Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby daniel_r on Mon May 01, 2006 12:24 am

#1 for simple symmetry and no background distractions. It creates a clean image and pleasant tonality.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby PiroStitch on Mon May 01, 2006 1:26 am

The composition, simplicity and lighting for the first pic is the best. Was that with the 12-24?
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby johnd on Mon May 01, 2006 8:26 am

Peter, it's a toss up between #1 and #2. #3 doesn't do it for me, the bold colours look a bit too contrived. I think I prefer #1 best of all. It says reaching to the sky and the back lighting works really well too.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby huynhie on Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am

I prefer the composition on number one and the colour of number three, is that too much to ask for. :lol: BTW I didn't know that there was a light house in Darling Harbour. :shock:
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby owen on Mon May 01, 2006 8:34 am

I like number 2 but think maybe you could crop the top off it a little.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby DionM on Mon May 01, 2006 9:21 am

#1 does it for me. Stunning.

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby MATT on Mon May 01, 2006 9:22 am

I like three , The white against the blue is stunning.


MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby the foto fanatic on Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am

All are good, but I prefer #1 also.

That perspective really gives the viewers the sense that they are looking at a bloody tall structure! The relief of the windows against the stark white bricks is cool too.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby SteveGriffin on Mon May 01, 2006 9:59 am

Peter all 3 are very good. It would depend where you were going to hang it / them. I could find a place for #1 & #3
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby moggy on Mon May 01, 2006 10:07 am

I would agree with Steve, #1 and #3 do it for me. :wink:

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby wmaburnett on Mon May 01, 2006 3:27 pm

I just love these, so beautiful and peaceful!
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby marcotrov on Mon May 01, 2006 3:42 pm

I think #1 takes the prize here for it's simplicity, high key effect, soft lighting under the walkway of the tower, exposure spot on, wonderful symmetry and I like the positioning of the 3 windows, they add a bit of interest to the otherwise featureless column.
#2 More natural but still vivid colours buyt seems unfinished. Either include more of the Lighthouse tower or, again using your wonderful sense of symmetry, crop it close underneath the rounded walkway so that only a small yet defined section of column remains but focus maintained on the head of the structure. Don't know if that makes sense Peter. :? :)
#3 Lovely composition and symmetry but clours a tad oversaturated, as much as I like a bit of vibrance in colours :wink:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 01, 2006 9:05 pm

Thank you one and all for your comments. It would seem the consensus is #1 and I have to say that while I originally leant towards #3 I've decided #1 is the one for my annual photo collection.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques