


cheers
marco
Variations on a subjectModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Marco, maybe I'm over macro'd at the moment, but of these #2 is the only one that works. In that I like the starburst effect you've managed with the foreground flowers and the great OOF buds.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Marco I can see why you love Macro it has such an isolated dimension to it
the 3rd one has great composition with the flower at the botom corner and the out of focus area further isolatign and giving prominence to the main subject. I notice your one of the few who uses asymetrical composition to great effect, usually macro people centre the subject, an obvious solution i would just make the 3rd a bit darker(shadow contrast) for better effect.
Thanks for kind comments Craig and Macka. Matt I'll experiment with the series in print
![]() Peter in the series I tried to show the progression of growth from tight buds to full flowered bloom whilst using depth of field to try to highlight this evolution. Sometimes you need a break from a style that has personally reached oversaturation. Perhaps you best not look at the next series ![]() Wendell thanks for the in depth comment it helps me to reflect on how I tackle subjects and themes. ![]() cheers marco
The composition has made a great difference with these, this is very interesting, a little bit different and very engaging for the viewer, your use of DOF has been very well executed, and with well thought out backdrops...
The series idea works well too... Look good as a printed series in a single frame... Aka Andrew
Marco,
I really like 2 and 3 - the viewpoints are different to the norm and the use of DOF is wonderful, especially in the 3rd one. I also like the overall "pinkness" of no. 3 - the small amount of background contrasting colour as well as the yellow stamens (?) on the flower combine really well to make a great image. Frank My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<< "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|