Page 1 of 1
Hunter Harvest

Posted:
Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:06 pm
by stubbsy

Posted:
Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:17 pm
by wendellt
that last one is has got such a minimalist sophisticated composition i like very much!

Posted:
Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:25 pm
by marcotrov
Lovely set Peter . Lve the mix of vibrant coours in #1 and as wendell has mentioned the minimalist approach you have used combined with the lighting in the last really works.
cheers
marco

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:25 am
by stubbsy
Wendell, Marco
Thanks for your comments. I also like the minimalism of that last one, but just didn't think it was good enough to be my challenge entry

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:51 am
by Killakoala
Very nice Peter. If that last image is your back-up image for the comp, i'd love to see your main entry


Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
by Alpha_7
For me the pick of this lot is your so called 'backup' image. If this really isn't as good as your entry then I'm sure it will outshine your 'Splash' from last challenge (a much smaller field can't hurt either).

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:01 am
by stubbsy
Steve, Craig
You guys have me worried now. I didn't use the shot of the bottles for the challenge since Matt K had already posted a similar image
here. And
BTW we are up to 20 entries.

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:04 am
by Alpha_7
20 Entries and 2 hours for more entries to come in.
I guess with the new voting system, it's possible some entries won't get votes, or their will be a tie for the lower placings ?

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:31 am
by Glen
Stubbsy, I love your heads and tails image too

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:51 am
by stubbsy
Alpha_7 wrote:20 Entries and 2 hours for more entries to come in.
I guess with the new voting system, it's possible some entries won't get votes, or their will be a tie for the lower placings ?
Craig. It's inevitable that some images may not get votes, but this new system also makes it harder for individual voters to bias the results up or down. In terms of feedback, this makes the placing of comments after the voting even more important (and a comment is much better than a score anyway)

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:56 am
by Alpha_7
stubbsy wrote:Alpha_7 wrote:20 Entries and 2 hours for more entries to come in.
I guess with the new voting system, it's possible some entries won't get votes, or their will be a tie for the lower placings ?
Craig. It's inevitable that some images may not get votes, but this new system also makes it harder for individual voters to bias the results up or down. In terms of feedback, this makes the placing of comments after the voting even more important (and a comment is much better than a score anyway)
I actually just made the comment about the importance of the feedback in the other challenge thread

And I agree its more important to have feedback then a rank


Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:37 pm
by Sheila Smart
Love the last shot. Makes my eyes hurt!! It would make a good "stock" image.
Cheers
Sheila
the last one is the best :)

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:43 pm
by jben_net
Yeah I think the repitition style of composition has really worked for you here. One does not need bother applying the rule of thirds as much here, besides the line between the heads and tails. I feel the lighting is spot on too. The colours in the first one are also very nice and vibrant. Is that out of the camera with auto curves? Or is it done in post.

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:11 pm
by wmaburnett
they are all lovely but the last one i really like it seems very balanced and just makes my eyes happy.
Re: the last one is the best :)

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:15 pm
by stubbsy
jben_net wrote:Yeah I think the repitition style of composition has really worked for you here. One does not need bother applying the rule of thirds as much here, besides the line between the heads and tails. I feel the lighting is spot on too. The colours in the first one are also very nice and vibrant. Is that out of the camera with auto curves? Or is it done in post.
The first shot had quite a bit of PP to pump the colours of the grapes and the red leaf without making the green too saturated. Likewise the last image. Here's the original of both:


Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:21 pm
by wendellt
major difference peter
did you pump up the highlight contrast or just the exposure?
your combined efforts seeking out the subject, takign the pic and post processing them rewards you with a great result

Posted:
Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:29 pm
by stubbsy
wendellt wrote:major difference peter
did you pump up the highlight contrast or just the exposure?
your combined efforts seeking out the subject, takign the pic and post processing them rewards you with a great result
Wendell
I adjusted levels, curves and contrast for a balanced image, pushed the saturation of the image using Nik Color Efex Brilliance/Warmth filter and then painted the effect onto only the red leaves and the grapes. Finally I added a saturation layer and desaturated all but the grapes and the red leaves to further separate them from the background.