
Thanks
Noisy GirlModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Noisy GirlWould like some feedback on this image. Whether or not it works for you, if the noise is too much, complete waste of bandwith, etc, etc.
![]() Thanks "Sometimes when you are sad Poko, it's good to hug the monkey."
The framing (composition) is great how it draws us to the exposed eye - but then there is the brickwall...The look of the little girl is priceless, but the noise does detract from the photo. Its not a waste by all means...
Mike
Works for me but i would have exposed it differently. I would have preferred to see a darker image to befit the moodiness of the subject. Also i would have smeared mud and old leaves on the kids face to enhance the 'lost kid in the wilderness' look
![]() Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Matt has a pathological aversion to any portrait in front of a brick wall.
And in this instance, I don't like it much either. However, I like the composition and the noise is fine, noise in BW tends to look a bit like grain and I quite like that. The lowish contrast and eye being underexposed are not so good in my view. But I think there is a great shot in the making. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
mmm... close to a great photo... think if you pp the brick wall to remove the little person in front, then we'd get a much better look at the main subject...
![]() seriously though... I like the composition and the noise is fine... I'd play around with the levels a little and explore what you can get out of this. oh and probably look to remove/blur or otherwise reduce the impact of the wall. ![]()
I really like this portrait and the noise or grain seems appropriate for the mood of the photo.
On second glance the brick wall, especially the gap between the bricks, could be a little distracting. Perhaps having the subject standing further in front of the wall to increase DOF blur is an option, but there's alaways a hundred ways to improve a photo. I like it how it is. Jonas Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70, Sigma 70-300DG APO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasphoto/
Thanks for the comments. For some reasons notification about replies never reached me, so i didn't realise the were infact comments.
Points re the brickwall are taken on board and agreed with. Unfortunately it is all there is to my backyard...very small space enclosed with bricks. Mj, I thought of you as I posted the image...wondered if it would meet your approval! Will play with the image some more....thanks for the hints. "Sometimes when you are sad Poko, it's good to hug the monkey."
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|