Page 1 of 1

My shitty shots

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:28 am
by blacknstormy
Well, at least I'm honest.... but who'd expect pelicans, a pacific heron, great egret with fish and to top it all off, 3 jabiru in a large dam in Ipswich???????

Moby Dick (Pacific heron)
Image

Cisticola
Image

Great egret with fish
Image

Jabiru
Image

pelican in Ipswich
Image

galahs in flight
Image

Moby Dick in flight
Image

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:52 am
by Oneputt
I think that the Cisticola is the pick. Very nice. :D

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:29 am
by Pa
BIRDS ARE ONE OF MY PASSIONS THESE ARE VERY GOOD SHOTS,NOT SHITTY, TO ME.
PA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:06 pm
by Alpha_7
I agree with Pa I think these aren't worthy of the shit title, it is an awesome variety of bird life for a Dam

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:38 pm
by avkomp
interesting variety of birds. especially where you were.

need more reach for birding though.
guess these were with the 105??

The cistacola is about the range I usually get them also.
I am still smiling about the one I here posted the other day.
they can be ellusive especially around here.

Steve

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:03 pm
by blacknstormy
Thanks for the positive comments everyone :) ..... I meant shitty as in not close enough/clear enough/ or just 'enough', if you know what I mean. It is amazing to have this amount of birdlife out here at the moment, you can tell we need some more rain very very soon !!!!

These were actually all taken with the 80-200 WITH the 1.7TC on tripod, and heavily cropped, so you can see they were way way out, and basically, I didn't have a hope. :( One day, I'll be able to afford a long range tele, but not for a long time I think .... but it is fun playing (if frustrating).

Oh well, can't hurt to have a go??? LOL

Rel

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:08 pm
by avkomp
i was thinking of getting a tc to use with my 400. because it usually doesnt have the legs I need

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:50 pm
by stephen
Prob would have been a bit easier to see posted a little larger

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:05 pm
by avkomp
out of curiosity stephen, did you click on the shots to display the larger version, or are you commenting on the size of the linked images??

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:12 pm
by lkgrainger
Hi all,
blacknstormy have to been out towards Nth Ippy dont turn toward Kholo go straight and you come to a bridge it has power lines running beside it that have eagles/hawks sitting on them quite frequently. I've tried and failed to get good pics.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:45 pm
by blacknstormy
lkgrainger - wicked, will go out and have a look one day this week :)
The dam is out past Ripley - go through Ripley, and just keep going ... the road goes from bitumen to dirt, go around the corner (be careful, there are a lot of d**kheads out that way) and go over the rise ...... there is a large dam on the left (part of a reserve) that borders the gun club of all things. At the moment, there are a heap of pelicans, 3 jabiru, the pacific heron, heaps of stilts, swans and ducks.... not bad for Ippy :)

Avkomp - if you haven't got the legs on your 400, what hope do I have????? Can you use a TC with the 400?

Stephen - they are just the thumbnails - if you click on them, you get the full 800 pixel image :)

Thanks guys :)
Rel

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:01 pm
by avkomp
Rel:

the 400 gets you shots, just that you have to work harder and it has limitations ( without wishing to start up an old thread where we discussed the pros and cons of this)
Take my current cistacola for instance, it isnt a bad shot. but obtained by hiding in long grass for quite a while. I prefocussed also where I hoped one would go and continually checked light so in case of a QR target I could get a shot off. I mistakenly quoted 85 % of frame but was less. longer glass would have given me a bigger image in the frame or let me shoot from a more comfy position. Cistacolas are small and shy. if you were after bigger stuff less problems would be found.

most of the pros or those with lots of money to spare get fast primes the order of 600mm and even stack TCs on them. regardless of what we have we will always wish for more.
Its all about the money really and the 80-400 produces decent images for the money.
I believe you can use TCs with it but need to look into it further. I fear that it will slow the lens down more so also but would live with that.

Steve

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:41 pm
by Slider
Very nice Rel. I'm with OP, number 2 is my pick :D