


Cheers
Steffen.
Symmetry or lack thereof?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Symmetry or lack thereof?Here's another shot from my Brissy trip, again taken from the Goodwill bridge. What struck me was the contrast between symmetry in shapes and asymmetry in light. I'm still debating with myself whether this is crap or ok...
![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers Steffen.
Steffen, I like it infact I have a shot under a bridge in Singapore (near the Merelion and Fullterton hotel that has a similar quality just different lighting). I think you've done well to compose very accurately, and the shadows mix it up too.
dont mind this.
different view of an everyday thing. certainly not crap. the hot bits on the right catch my eye though. I would tone them down. or even clone some of the less bright stuff over it. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Yeah, that puzzled me for a while. It turns out that most of the area that looks hot is not actually blown, esp not the white and magenta bits. I measured it with the eye-dropper, and there is only a small fringe where the red or blue (or both) channels reach 0xFF. This can also be seen in a screenshot from the RAW converter I used, highlighting the blown bits: ![]() I'm going to have another look when I'm back home at my calibrated CRT... ![]() Cheers Steffen.
Steffen. This is a great capture, especially given the light levels that you had to deal with. I really like the shapes of the bridge understructure and your care in framing them to emphasise the symmetry makes all the difference. Maybe slight crop on left & right would make the hot area less strking, but as it is this is an excellent image.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
May I suggest to convert to high constrast mono - that will give it more oomph!
Cheers Sheila Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur On-line Gallery here
I agree, a mono version would be nice. But it's nice as is. GC
based on the brutality I inflicted on my honeyeater the other day, I reckon a few minute clone job would bring the bright stuff down to the same level as the rest of the image.
Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Hah, easier said than done! I'm quite inexperienced in PP. However, I managed to come up with a bunch of b/w conversions in the past few hours ![]() ![]() Cheers Steffen. PS I thought I had posted this an hour ago, but it doesn't seem to show. Apologies if this turns up as a duplicate...
Re: Symmetry or lack thereof?
I think it is an excellent capture, the highlight is a bit bright but overall I love the structure/water and the other areas in the frame. I am going to Brissy myself tomorrow but not to take great shots like this unfortunately ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|