Some more dark sky stuff

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some more dark sky stuff

Postby Big V on Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:42 pm

Tonights efforts

The frist one shows you that there are a huge amount of satellites up there, 3 in 15 seconds..taken with the 50mm but at f2.5 this time 1600 ISO
Image

This next one was taken with a 17mm lens at f4 and 3200 ISO for 30 seconds..
Image

Last one is of a satellite passing through one of our companion galaxies - the satellite trail is faint.. 50mm 1600 f2.5
Image
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:02 am

Lovely lovely stuff, simple inspirational. I'm definitely going to try a little of this over the weekend when I'm away from the big smoke (weather permitting). Out of the Kit lens, 80-200 2.8 and 70-300G which is the better lens ? kit for the wide angle ? or 80-200 for the 2.8 ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:03 am

LOVELY AND technical

what's the white line on the first one, perhaps a comet?
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:06 am

what's the white line on the first one, perhaps a comet?


That would be the above mentioned satellite, Wendell.

If you look closely there are a number of them moving quickly over the night sky, captured as faint light trails.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:13 am

Alpha_7 wrote:
what's the white line on the first one, perhaps a comet?


That would be the above mentioned satellite, Wendell.

If you look closely there are a number of them moving quickly over the night sky, captured as faint light trails.


thanks craig, amazing stuff
it could of also been a UFO
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Big V on Wed Jan 25, 2006 3:40 pm

Go for the 2.8 to start with and then try the kit for the wide angle....with the wide angle you can probably go to 30 seconds without star trailing but at the longer focal lengths, keep to 20 or so..
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Slider on Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:52 pm

Great Stuff. I take it the satelites are the 3 short straight lines?
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Big V on Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:16 pm

Yes, the straight lines are the satellites..
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques