



harbour bridge walk .... (DU warning)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
harbour bridge walk .... (DU warning)a few pics from the other day walking across the Harbour Bridge, all with D200 and 50/1.4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by james m on Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
James these are great, totally unexpected and refreshingly unique approach.
I think #1 is my favourite, but I also really like the last one. Are all of these taken with D200 ?
Seems you like this style James.
![]() ![]()
I like them all, 1,2 & 4 I like the best because you can still tell what the subject is, without it being the subject of the photo.
Out of those three, if I had to choose a favourite it would be number 4. Where is t taken from, near the Quay or the opposite corner near the swimming pool? Either way, I like it. Well done. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
James
That first image is very strong. You've used the OOF to great effect and created a really appealing image. The eye is grabbed by the lovely sharp foreground then lingers to discover the nicely blurred OH in the background. While I understand the concepts of the rest of the series I have pretty much the same observations as Trent. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I like the last one best for emotional effect, it's a very cosey image and hints the overphotographed landmark intelligently
the others are very original i like the way you present the common and familiar with new interest.
James - an excellent perspective of what has generally become an over photographed icon. These remind me very much of Billington’s work - well done
![]() Last edited by sirhc55 on Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
All very good shots but the above states the problem I find. The opera house is barely recognizable and whilst looking at the apple, your mind is wandering off to keep checking out what the white thing is drawing attention away from where the mind really should be focussed. I would have liked a little more DOF in shot #1 and probably a better subject as foreground interest. The image tends to suggest the opera house is a dirty place. Nice series and I'd clearly take #4 as the pick of the bunch. Mark
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|