then he left...
comments very welcom.
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
craneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
crane
I saw this crane of some sort when i was out taking a few random pics at the the local nature reserve near home. They turned out alright for being shot at 1600 iso.
then he left...
comments very welcom. Last edited by NJ on Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
I'll be very honest from a non bird watcher/photographer prospective.
pic #1, is a nice shot with the bird's reflection on the water very appealling, but the foreground is a distraction. It takes away the continuality of the bird. pic#2, would be a great shot if the wings were spread out during flight. Nice location though Last edited by nito on Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hey nito, they were the same thought that i had, its the best i could do though. Are they really that bad kipper?
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
nah its all good, i didnt take it as being harsh. i realised the foreground was too busy, but it was the best i could get so hey! and the 70-300mm isnt exactly a fast focuser so i didnt have much oppotunity for the in flight shot.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
looks like a gbh (great blue heron) to me...
shots aren't too bad.... cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Well the last I looked we weren't in America 
We have no species called a GBH here, well according to my limited knowledge and the books that I have. I'm about 99.99% this is a white faced heron, and I'd most likely say it's a juvenille aswell as it has a rusty patch on it's breast. NJ Shot #1 - way to distracting with all the grasses/reeds in front of the subject. Probably would also be fairly distracting to have them behind the bird aswell but I could of lived with it if the bird was clear from any obstruction. Shot #2 - no eye contact with the bird and it's flying directly away. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
