Practising tracking focus

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Practising tracking focus

Postby blacknstormy on Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:15 pm

Just wondering what you thought - practising tracking birds in flight. I know it's only a pigeon, but had to practise with something :)
Rel

Image
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby kipper on Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

It looks pretty sharp from where I'm sitting, could of done with a little fill on the tail feathers. Looks like it's also a fairly big crop?
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby DaveB on Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:56 pm

kipper wrote:It looks pretty sharp from where I'm sitting, could of done with a little fill on the tail feathers.

Agreed.

However, it's hard to tell with this size image. If it's a 100% crop, I'd say that I'm very impressed. But if it's close to full-frame, we just can't see enough detail to comment. Is the wing sharper than the eye? I suspect so but can't tell from here.
We can see the sharpening halos, so you've obviously applied some sharpening to the final file (as would be expected). Maybe a touch too much, but that may be a matter of taste.

Overall, a nice image of a different type of flying rat...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby rokkstar on Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:57 pm

I like it. I like the position of the wing.
What lens did you use to get that? I have never been able to get anything as remotely sharp as that.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby blacknstormy on Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:43 pm

Kipper, DaveB & Rokkstar - thank you for your comments. Agreed, I probably did oversharpen, but it is a HUGE crop.... It was taken with the Nikon 80-200 2.8.
Thanks for your comments - it's all a bit different to insect shots :)
Rel
Here is the original image:
Image
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Manta on Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:46 pm

For someone who doesn't ordinarily get into these shots (you have to be looking ABOVE the leaf litter occasionally!) I think it's a corker Narelle.

80-200mm?
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby blacknstormy on Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:56 pm

Simon - did a bad bad thing. Found a second hand 80-200 2.8, and Damian let me buy it :) Weighs a bloody tonne, but worth it. When I come back to work next week, I'll have a left forearm 2 times the size it was when I went on holidays :) I've ordered a 1.7TC from Birddog, so the world is my oyster :wink:
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby birddog114 on Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:18 am

blacknstormy wrote:Simon - did a bad bad thing. Found a second hand 80-200 2.8, and Damian let me buy it :) Weighs a bloody tonne, but worth it. When I come back to work next week, I'll have a left forearm 2 times the size it was when I went on holidays :) I've ordered a 1.7TC from Birddog, so the world is my oyster :wink:


blacknstormy,

Firstly congrats on your new purchase! yes it's heavy!

What version of the 80-200 which you purchased? I hope you did with the Nikkor 80-200 AF-S/ 2.8.

Secondly! It's also a bad news for you if you did not score the 80-200/ 2.8 AF-S, the TC 1.7 is on its way to my store this morning, but it didn't work or not mountable with the 80-200/ 2.8 (AF/ or AF-D), it will work or mountable with the 80-200AF-S

Pls. visit this link to see the compatibility of the teleconverter.

http://blog.nikonians.org/archives/Niko ... 0Table.pdf.

Or you should ask first prior to order, and hope the above is not your case.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:52 am

It's all cool Birddog - its the AFS. Checked it all out before I ordered the TC from you, and before I bought the second hand lens .... but thank you very very much for taking the time to let me know just the same.

Have a great day Birddog :)
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:00 am

does this mean you are not getting close and personal to bugs anymore ?.........or just another weapon.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:26 am

just another 'weapon' - feels like one. I have to walk around with it perched ontop of my left forearm, or holding it by the tripod collar. It weighs just over 2 kgs !!!! Needed a fast tracking lens for our fauna surveys, and this was cheaper than the VR, but a very sweet lens.

But it's ok - will be out hunting bugs this evening at Goomburra State Forest, just through Cunningham's Gap on the way to Warwick.....
Hopefully, a couple of rare frogs tonight as well :)
Cheers
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby kipper on Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:34 am

You'll get used to it Rel.

But 2kg....pah! The total weight of the 500AFS (3.5kg) with all the other added bits and peices must be around the 5kg mark.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:45 am

But Kipper, you are a big burly male :) I would kill for the 500, but it would end in divorce :)
Have a great day
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby kipper on Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:57 am

There are a few girls on NSN that lug Canon gear of the same weight around and handhold it without a tripod for flight shots :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques