iso400
1/200,f2.8
-------------------
second pic is detail crop at about 70%
ok i updated it with new version,it removes that yellow color cast.now it looks more natural white at edges of petals.


Wild Beauty (macro + detail/crop)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wild Beauty (macro + detail/crop)d70/sigma 105 ex dg
iso400 1/200,f2.8 ------------------- second pic is detail crop at about 70% ok i updated it with new version,it removes that yellow color cast.now it looks more natural white at edges of petals. ![]() ![]() Last edited by PALL on Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pall.A.
Is that the real colour of the beatle ? If so I'd love one of the rested insect experts to ID it, I've never seen one look like that.
Nice shot, I think more DOF would of helped, the OOF bottom section I found distracting. Very interesting texture of the petals.
thanks Alpha_7 for comments,yeah the colors are real i only increased saturation in RAW,i dont know name of flower or beetle either.if any one knows tha flower name,do tell me.i want to rename it,wild beauty just kind anoying. also since i was doing HANDHELD shot "natural light overcast weather" so i can't increase tha aperture more or camera shake can ruin up stuff. Pall.A.
Well for hand held and in thoes lighting conditions, you did a great job. Well done. I'm sure will have a ID for the flower and beetle in no time..(is it beatle or beetle?)
Hi Pall - cool shot. (Thanks Craig, for letting me know about the post). I'm not sure, but I think the plant is a species of hibiscus (someone in here will know).
The beetle is a chrysomelid - These beetles are closely related to longicorn beetles and come in a variety of body shapes from elongate or flattened to globular. The larvae of leaf beetles are also variable in shape. Some species of adults may be mistaken for ladybird beetles due to their oval shape. Leaf beetles range in size from 5 to 25 millimetres in length and are usually brightly coloured as both adults and larvae. Both the larvae and adults of leaf beetles are herbivores and can be found feeding on the leaves and sometimes the stems of a wide variety of plants. Not at all sure of the species (though I know I've seen it before).... Well done ![]() Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
thanks blacknstormy too much,wow that will be agreat info you know about bugs,if i ever want to know about some name of bug i shot later some time then i will sure ask you about tha name.i also chekig your site DFF.and photos.
kool,cya. Pall.A.
PALL - great shots and Sigma rules
![]() Just be a little wary of oversharpening as the beetle appears to have a tad too much halation ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
thanks,yeah i think sharp too much,i used unsharp filter in nikon capture but i only used it little bit.anyway the detail crop always gona have tha jagged edges even if i lower the sharpnes. is main image still looks good or over sharp? thanks,you uses sigma too,i checking out ya web site. Pall.A.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|