I thought I would practise this new found technique.....but now I don't know which part of the leading eye to focus on, the front or the back........ any suggestions would be appreciated


Focus on leading eyeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Focus on leading eyeI read in a recent posting that a portrait shot should have the main focal point on the leading eye (definately not the nose).
I thought I would practise this new found technique.....but now I don't know which part of the leading eye to focus on, the front or the back........ any suggestions would be appreciated ![]() ![]() 'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
Glen, not bad....your were right three out of three....D2X, 70-200VR and 1.7TC....just having a bit of fun with them with them on a rainy sunday afternoon.....
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
At this range I'd suggest focussing on the iris. (It's okay Mic - another sort of iris). This might be a very telling portrait to any iridologist out there looking at it and the subject might be upset by the disclosure of such intimate facts.
Excellent close work, Stuart. Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Stuart, truly unbelievable when one considers it must have been taken from the other side of the room.
ps Stuart, thought I should point out I knew you had a D2X and I got the lens info from Iexif, just in case you thought I could recognise lenses, I can't, but it did give me the focal length of 340mm so I guessed from there.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|