Hi Tim - at the risk of drawing cries of eternal damnation from others, I'm going to say I think this could be better. That's not to say I don't like it, or that it's crap - I just think it could be better
What I find most distracting is the lost detail in the shadows - especially the right side of the face. This dog has character, and to most, character is usually summed up in the face.
[start woffle]
I could go on about a whole heap of studies that show beyond doubt that, to humans at least, the most important aspect of any animal is it's face - but I won't. To be honest, I don't know of any such studies, and I certainly couldn't point you in their direction. I did hear something like that on TV the other day though, so it must be right ;) [end woffle]
I don't really mind the slightly blown highlight on the left - these things usually look ok when converted to black & white or similar (as you've done nicely here). But if you could do some local dodging perhaps to bring up more of the face, I think you'd be pleased with the effort
I also gotta say that the frame does nothing for this print - a more simple black, or slightly brown-black, would do it much more justice
All these things I say as my own ever so humble opinion, and in the end, you must make the decision on the quality or otherwise. After all, it's your pic - and presumably your dog
