Coastal landscapes (II) Light house and contrast shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Coastal landscapes (II) Light house and contrast shots

Postby Willy wombat on Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:51 pm

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{2C7F091D-5B90-46DB-A53E-A5CFF22227ED}/picture.JPG[/img]

A bit of PP treatment
[img]http://www.fototime.com/{3D7F7EB1-E6AB-4E5D-A4E1-B846EF653F26}/picture.JPG[/img]

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{4C05D483-08E6-49DB-A5A9-4AA8816EC7EA}/picture.JPG[/img]

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{B7BE1523-B52F-4187-821A-939B50C7AC9F}/picture.JPG[/img]
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby nat on Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:20 am

Hi WW,
I have just looked at all three of you threads in this series. I have to say that in general I really like the colours you achieve. The richness of the reds compliment the depth of the blues really well.
Some of my thoughts on this series:
#1 - seems to lack punch. I wonder if adjusting the levels, brightness/contrast, saturation may help. Also the grass appears soft for me. Was this a DOF choice or was it really windy?
#2 - interesting lighting. Was it late in the day or was this a result of the cloud cover?
#3 - love the colours!! :D I think I would prefer more of a balance between the amount of "red" and "blue" in the image. For me, the red appears to dominate the image a little too much.
#4 - I like the simplicity of this one.

Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
nat
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:39 pm

meerkat wrote:Hi WW,
I have just looked at all three of you threads in this series. I have to say that in general I really like the colours you achieve. The richness of the reds compliment the depth of the blues really well.
Some of my thoughts on this series:
#1 - seems to lack punch. I wonder if adjusting the levels, brightness/contrast, saturation may help. Also the grass appears soft for me. Was this a DOF choice or was it really windy?
#2 - interesting lighting. Was it late in the day or was this a result of the cloud cover?
#3 - love the colours!! :D I think I would prefer more of a balance between the amount of "red" and "blue" in the image. For me, the red appears to dominate the image a little too much.
#4 - I like the simplicity of this one.

Thanks for sharing.


Hi MK - First off - thanks for taking the time to write back. I really apreciate it when peopel take the time to give feedback on my posts - so thanks.

#1 was a bit of a tough shot exposure-wise because it was glarey and overcast. I took about 15 shots before i found something i was happy with. Hence the high level of PP in #2 - which was an ordinary image that i played with to achieve something interesting enough to post. I basically chopped it at the horizon and made a layer for the foreground, and then used levels and burn tool to bring the sky/background back and made it "dramatic" and then I over saturated the foreground and lighened it. An interesting effect but i think i butchered the stitching.

#3 I can see where you are coming from - it was a shot to demonstrate the contrast between land and sea, im not sure how i should crop it to try and get less red.

#4 - To me the boat made this shot. Without it - the shot would be a little dull with nothing to look for in the BG. I also wanted to try and portray the vastness between me and it (as the subject) with an interesting contrasting sharp rock ledge in the foreground. I think i will get it printed off and see how it looks at larger size.

Cheers WW :)
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques