Is PP good?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Is PP good?

Postby stubbsy on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:02 pm

Here are two recent pics where I just can't work out what PP treatment brings out the image. This is my current take on them. To see a larger version, click the pic.

Do these work for you?

Edit: The original image with no PP added for both shots.

a Black and white opera house...


Image

Image


and a colour ghostly boat...


Image

Image
Last edited by stubbsy on Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby MCWB on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:09 pm

Peter: B&W Opera House works, not sure about the cropping on the left hand side though, the edge isn't 'clean' for some reason?

The second shot doesn't work for me at all however: I look at the foreground, "nothing to see here", then look at the (nice) background. My interest is then kept by the background, which probably misses the intended point of the capture?
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:11 pm

Peter,

I like the first one, definitely a fine representation of our famous landmark.

The second one I'm not so sure on... the ghost bit seems super pixelated and it doesn't really do it for me.

(Do you have the orginals handy for comparison?)

Thanks,
Craig
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby TonyH on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:12 pm

I really like the Ghost Ship. The opera House is just a little too tightly cropped for me.

Great work

Regards

Tony
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby Matt. K on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:13 pm

Peter
Opera house works very well and is a fine image. As fine as any of the building I have seen . Second image is interesting and has some lovely elements, which you have picked up on...but falls over because the boat is not defined or recognizable. But a very nice abstract anyway.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby wendellt on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:35 pm

the ghost ship is excellent
in the frame opera house fitted snug under bridge, whilst the light trail from the ship brings the viewer in from the right and sets their attention firmy at the apex of the opera house bridge, what did you photoshop on the image? looks fine the way it is
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:36 pm

Hmmmm, looks like a divide audience :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby chris1968 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:39 pm

hello stubbsy
love #1 - tight crops i like, simple images i like, black and white i love!
#2 did not do it for me on first glance but, the more i look, the more i like!

Chris
in the beginning was the word, and the word was Aardvark......
User avatar
chris1968
Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Dark Side of the Moors. West Yorks. England.....D70

Postby mic on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:59 pm

Stubbsy, you should be in advertising with that 2nd shot :shock:

Love it ! Sydney in a nutshell to me.

Well done mate !

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby kamran on Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:24 pm

1st B&W pic is real nice. And not so sure about the 2nd one.
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
User avatar
kamran
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:35 pm

I really love the second one. :)
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby sheepie on Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:44 pm

Peter...

Believe it or not I actually like the ferry pic! I didn't at first, but I've kept coming back to it through the evening and have now decided I do.
It has that clarrity which your pics tend to have (especially the ones from this outing), and the colours are at their usual vivid but accurate best. What I think it would benefit from though is seeing more of the Opera House. It just feels a little too cut-off for me at the moment.

The close-up of the Opera House has been nicely handled, if also a little too tightly cropped for my liking. I love the way you do B&W, simple objects with great attention to contrast and overall levels.
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby stubbsy on Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:46 am

Some very interesting responses people. Thank you.

Trent - I hadn't noticed, but you're right about the untidyness on the left. It's part of another sail which I removed with the tight crop. I'll go back and fix this for my final version.

Craig - I'll post originals and my final rework tonight.

Wendell - second image was layered to bring up the background details without making the ghost ship too bright. I also bumped the sat on the background and less so for the ship (so it wouldn't be too orange)

One & all
The second pic is an odd one for me too. The divided opinions seem to confirm my own ambivalence about this image. Originally I had it marked as a reject, but something about it appealed hence this post. In fact I even considered entering it in the current movement comp, but decided it was a little too "out there".
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby wendellt on Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:56 am

Peter

yeah i thought the ship looked to god to be true,usually under long exposure they are more orange in colour because of the irradescent lights they have on board. The blue tone contributes to the scenes elegance

the first opera house shot is not as good as the other white opera house image you posted months back, too much going on in the bottom left, the opera house should always be framed elegantly less glass more white sails in my opintion, I find framing 2 to 3 sails is enough you don't need more as you risk taking that 'standard' opera house shot. 'Less is more' keep things simple.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:41 pm

Wendell - "the first opera house shot is not as good as the other white opera house image you posted months back". Agreed - that one was shot in bright daylight (I'm assuming this is the one you meant)

Anyways as promised: I've update the top of the thread to show side by sides, plus below is a slightly less cropped version of the first one.

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby sheepie on Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:47 pm

this is much better Peter - and amazing to see it compared to the NEF!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques