Hlop wrote:Seems to be very sharp lens Chris! But I see some chromatic abberations at petals edges. Will you be able to post couple of more examples containing some high contrast areas?
Will do Mikhail

New LensModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
40 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Will do Mikhail ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Chris... any more shots with this lens?
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
I will try and get some more shots together over the weekend Mark ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
thanks ![]() http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
I have this lens
![]() It does a great job, what I like about it is the F2.8 and also the macro ability. It is attached to my S2 all time and is great for events ![]()
I was expressing interest in getting one of these lenses and our generous Patron was kind enough to lend me his for a few days. I thought I'd do a few tests on it. As I was a bit short of a handy brick wall, this timber post was my subject. No PP at all just cropped and sized:
![]() At f2.8 100% crop: ![]() At f4: ![]() At f5.6: ![]() At f8: ![]() Pretty damm impressive ![]() Last edited by johndec on Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
thanks for that.... very sharp indeed!
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
As said, at f2.8, sharpness is more than useable, at f.4 it sings!
I had the Tamron 28-75 on my D2x for the two days shooting at RAAF Williamtown (Fri) and Boat Harbour same as Fisherman Bay last weekend. The main reason, I didn't use my Nikon 28-70/ f.8 due to its size. IMHO, the photo qualities from this Tamron lens are the same or equal with the Nikon 28-70 f2.8, lack of AF-S on the Tamron but it's still fast in focussing, its price is 1/3 or close to 1/2 the price of the Nikon 28-70. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
FYI. This is the f2.8 crop with moderate sharpening (225 0.5 0). I would not worry about shooting with this lens at f2.8 as even a little sharpening brings it up to near the quality of the sweet spot ~f5.6-f8 :
![]() If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
Previous topic • Next topic
40 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|