
1/60s f/5.6 at 170.0mm iso200

Lots of messing with green channel and color replacement
1/50s f/5.6 at 200.0mm iso200
This one is a little sad - I didn't notice till afterwards.

Messed around with Hue and Saturation
1/40s f/10.0 at 150.0mm iso200
Alright, now I am really happy with the VR18-200 (3 Images)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Alright, now I am really happy with the VR18-200 (3 Images)What do you think of these snaps? I also got the chance to be a little arty
![]() 1/60s f/5.6 at 170.0mm iso200 ![]() Lots of messing with green channel and color replacement 1/50s f/5.6 at 200.0mm iso200 This one is a little sad - I didn't notice till afterwards. ![]() Messed around with Hue and Saturation 1/40s f/10.0 at 150.0mm iso200 D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Hi Justin,
these images are showing great results; particularly looking at the shutter speed. I assume they were done handheld ? I like them. Cheers, CD
Hi Justin,
the first image isn't for me, I can't find a point of interest for the eyes to come back to and start straying from. For a study in green it is too busy and has too many foreign tones. The second one I like a lot. This is a nice condensation of the idea of orange. The last shot is the opposite of the first, too many interesting/intriguing subjects in one picture. It looks like you're accentuating certain spots through colour, however they don't pull in the same direction but seem to fight for supremacy, making the image confusing. But maybe that's just me being thick... ![]() Cheers Steffen.
All the shots were handheld - I'm getting good shots down to 1/10 at medium zoom with this lens.
In the first image, I like the backlit ground leaves, with the grass in the background and the leaves being blown by the wind. You are right about the third photo, it shows I couldn't quite decipher it's meaning. Some flowers marking the scene of an accident, what the heck is 'bie Iams' shaking his finger at. The colours draw attention to the flowers on the tree, in the original they are faded brown and just fade into the tree. I need to ponder some more on this one, what does it mean... I also have a wider shot of the same subject, I'll see if anything sensible comes out of that. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
nice work...... google up selective colour in Photoshop........ easy to do and a lot more control.......... here is a sample......
![]() Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
![]() Nice one Justin. Ahh the memories of the buzz from those first images of your own telephoto lense. Interesting bokeh on the highly saturated image in No 1. No 2 has a very eerie appeal - but I always like yellow!!! D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
Just another brick in the wall? Way to much photography gear is never enough!
Hey Suri, if the Marigolds appear yellow, check the color temperature on your PC - At high temp (normal computer monitor WB), they appear yellow and at lower temp (6500 or so, better for pics IMHO) they appear much more orange... or am I colourblind?
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Yeah - thanks Justin Now I've just wasted an hour trying to calibrate my monitor. Guess it must be me who is blind, but when I make your Marigolds go Orange I really don't like the balance of results elsewhere. Thinks I'm going to have to live with yellow Marigolds!! D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
great work! i really like the first two. although not technically correct i find the yellow of the marigolds works really well... for me at least.
the third picture has great potential but finger shaking Robbie in the background doesnt seem to sit well with the theme of the picture. my eyes were drawn straight to it and only after that did i take in the rest of the picture.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|