Alright, now I am really happy with the VR18-200 (3 Images)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Alright, now I am really happy with the VR18-200 (3 Images)

Postby Justin on Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:35 pm

What do you think of these snaps? I also got the chance to be a little arty

Image

1/60s f/5.6 at 170.0mm iso200

Image
Lots of messing with green channel and color replacement
1/50s f/5.6 at 200.0mm iso200

This one is a little sad - I didn't notice till afterwards.
Image

Messed around with Hue and Saturation
1/40s f/10.0 at 150.0mm iso200
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Ronza on Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:53 pm

Great second shot, very arty feel to it but a strong image.
User avatar
Ronza
Member
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: West Lakes, Adelaide

Postby christiand on Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:58 pm

Hi Justin,

these images are showing great results; particularly looking at the shutter speed.
I assume they were done handheld ?
I like them.

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby suzanneg on Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:22 pm

I really like the first one. The tones of green and the layered focus are very appealing. :D
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby Steffen on Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:52 am

Hi Justin,
the first image isn't for me, I can't find a point of interest for the eyes to come back to and start straying from. For a study in green it is too busy and has too many foreign tones.

The second one I like a lot. This is a nice condensation of the idea of orange.

The last shot is the opposite of the first, too many interesting/intriguing subjects in one picture. It looks like you're accentuating certain spots through colour, however they don't pull in the same direction but seem to fight for supremacy, making the image confusing. But maybe that's just me being thick... :)

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Justin on Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:20 am

All the shots were handheld - I'm getting good shots down to 1/10 at medium zoom with this lens.

In the first image, I like the backlit ground leaves, with the grass in the background and the leaves being blown by the wind.

You are right about the third photo, it shows I couldn't quite decipher it's meaning. Some flowers marking the scene of an accident, what the heck is 'bie Iams' shaking his finger at. The colours draw attention to the flowers on the tree, in the original they are faded brown and just fade into the tree.

I need to ponder some more on this one, what does it mean... I also have a wider shot of the same subject, I'll see if anything sensible comes out of that.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby big pix on Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:43 pm

nice work...... google up selective colour in Photoshop........ easy to do and a lot more control.......... here is a sample......

Image
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Suri on Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:49 pm

:D
Nice one Justin.
Ahh the memories of the buzz from those first images of your own telephoto lense.
Interesting bokeh on the highly saturated image in No 1.
No 2 has a very eerie appeal - but I always like yellow!!!
D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
User avatar
Suri
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: Redlands, Brisbane

Postby Dug on Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:14 pm

big pix wrote:nice work...... google up selective colour in Photoshop........ easy to do and a lot more control.......... here is a sample......

Image


Just another brick in the wall?
Way to much photography gear is never enough!
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby Justin on Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:18 pm

Hey Suri, if the Marigolds appear yellow, check the color temperature on your PC - At high temp (normal computer monitor WB), they appear yellow and at lower temp (6500 or so, better for pics IMHO) they appear much more orange... or am I colourblind?
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Yi-P on Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:46 pm

Looks like the VR-II system is doing good on that lens 8)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Suri on Sat Jun 17, 2006 8:35 pm

Hey Suri, if the Marigolds appear yellow, check the color temperature on your PC - At high temp (normal computer monitor WB), they appear yellow and at lower temp (6500 or so, better for pics IMHO) they appear much more orange... or am I colourblind?


Yeah - thanks Justin
Now I've just wasted an hour trying to calibrate my monitor.
Guess it must be me who is blind, but when I make your Marigolds go Orange I really don't like the balance of results elsewhere.
Thinks I'm going to have to live with yellow Marigolds!!
D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
User avatar
Suri
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: Redlands, Brisbane

Postby DJXtreme on Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:56 pm

great work! i really like the first two. although not technically correct i find the yellow of the marigolds works really well... for me at least.

the third picture has great potential but finger shaking Robbie in the background doesnt seem to sit well with the theme of the picture. my eyes were drawn straight to it and only after that did i take in the rest of the picture.
DJXtreme
Member
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques