Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by pippin88 on Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:10 pm
-

pippin88
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Newcastle / Sydney
by leek on Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:29 pm
Glad you enjoyed it Nick... It is an awesome experience...
Can't wait to see your airborne shots...
I'll be flying back to Sydney in a couple of days and I'm looking forward to seeing those blue skies again... The gloomy weather here gets you down after a little while...
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by Matt. K on Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:04 pm
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by stubbsy on Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:21 am
Nick
Shots #2 and #3 shown here are the best of these for me - especially #2.
I browsed these at you gallery and must say I really like the clean layout on your web site, including the EXIF data at the bottom. Is there any way you can add the lens used (I know it's in the EXIF, but I'm guessing you're using some automated script so it may not be able to extract it).
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by birddog114 on Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:26 am
Nick,
Was that what he done to you all? let you did the preflight check and left you behind
Nice blue sky & reflection.
P.S: I thought Leight came along with the flight too!
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by pippin88 on Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:20 pm
Well, I've got to say his chopper noises were very realistic
Peter: Glad you liked the gallery, I was aiming for clean and simple. What you suggest is quite possible but I can't really be bothered. Would involve setting up photoshop actions to insert the data into the EXIF then remembering to use them on each photo. That's for actual lens, focal length is already there. (AFAIK lens name isn't recorded in EXIF?)
Birddy: Leigh wasn't present.
I took a lot of images, and have yet to go through them properly.
One thing I found was a tendancy to blow the whites, because it was a bright day but with some cloud shadows.
-

pippin88
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Newcastle / Sydney
by stubbsy on Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:44 pm
Nick
There's a maker field tag (ie a proprietary one) in the EXIF data that indicates the lens. I know iMatch interprets this somehow as do the various Nikon progs. But unless it's an automated thing then I'd agree it makes sense to not bother (or you could get iMatch which would automate it for you  ). I asked since I noticed many of these were shot at 18mm, but that could be a number of different lenses eg 12-24, 18-70, but my betting is it was the latter.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|