Few beachscapes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Few beachscapes

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:21 am

Hi,
Just few ordinary beach-scapes. Any comments? Any thoughts? :)

Long Reef surfers
Image
Long Reef and Dee Why beaches
Image
Surf Rescue
Image
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:30 am

The colours are not real to my taste!
You've gone to the beach? :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:44 am

Hi Birddog!

You can tweak to real colours or to colours you like. I've done last :)

What do you mean?
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:55 am

Hlop wrote:Hi Birddog!

You can tweak to real colours or to colours you like. I've done last :)

What do you mean?


Hilop,
Truely, they're too dark on my 3 difference monitors.
Maybe, I need new replacements monitors or visit my Optometrist for a new set of reading glass.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:31 am

Yeah, they are dark because I didn't want to make them brighter :) Left them dark and contrast on purpose, to create particular mood. I didn't want to create realistic image. Just a different look to the beach. Not sure if I achieved exactly what I wished but I like these photos and that's why I'm sharing them :)
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Onyx on Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:45 am

Well Mikhail, you have horizons straight as far as I can see... and my pet hate in landscapes is tilted horizons, so I think they're great! :)

I like the contrasty land bits - but the sky seems not to 'match up'... maybe try artificiallly saturating them. The first two, foreground interest is great - it does a good job leading the eye into the picture to give a sense of scale.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:28 am

Mikhail to be honest with you these aren't my cup of tea. I think the last one could of been improved with the whole "rubber ducky"/zodiak appearing in shot. As CHI mentioned the sky doesn't match the landscape below it.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:04 pm

I don't know what you guys mean by "sky doesn't much to landscape" I have to assure you that it hasn't been modified. All I've done is some levels/curves/saturation. Nothing else.
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:06 pm

Hlop wrote:I don't know what you guys mean by "sky doesn't much to landscape" I have to assure you that it hasn't been modified. All I've done is some levels/curves/saturation. Nothing else.


My earlier comments based on these. :wink: and they don't cut! :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:13 pm

These images look like film scans. Have you been playing with your film camera again Mikhail? :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:21 pm

Killakoala wrote:These images look like film scans. Have you been playing with your film camera again Mikhail? :)


Huh! They are film-scans! Well spotted, Steve! :D
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:36 pm

Hlop wrote:
Killakoala wrote:These images look like film scans. Have you been playing with your film camera again Mikhail? :)


Huh! They are film-scans! Well spotted, Steve! :D


The colours are not right and not natural!
That why I switched to digital film :wink: :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:54 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
The colours are not right and not natural!
That why I switched to digital film :wink: :wink:


I'm not switching anywhere. I'm still using my D70 but I'm using my film cameras from time to time.

As I mentioned above I was not going to make a documentary image of Dee Why and Long Reef and I agreed that colors aren't right. Artist, painting with watercolor for example, can not make natural and right colors - he/she creates new image. And that is what I was trying to do and that what's photography is all about. If I wanted proper colours I could take D70, grey card and result would be just regular dull landscape with natural colours :)
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:01 pm

Hlop wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
The colours are not right and not natural!
That why I switched to digital film :wink: :wink:


I'm not switching anywhere. I'm still using my D70 but I'm using my film cameras from time to time.

As I mentioned above I was not going to make a documentary image of Dee Why and Long Reef and I agreed that colors aren't right. Artist, painting with watercolor for example, can not make natural and right colors - he/she creates new image. And that is what I was trying to do and that what's photography is all about. If I wanted proper colours I could take D70, grey card and result would be just regular dull landscape with natural colours :)


So the purpose of these photos and this particular thread is not for C&C as stated in your post.
I understood, everyone has his/ her way to shoot or display the photo + colouring etc... but when you asked people to C&C (comments & thoughts), then there're replies.
If you just mentioned or asked : Film or Digi film?
Then the replies will be difference.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Hlop on Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:21 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
So the purpose of these photos and this particular thread is not for C&C as stated in your post.
I understood, everyone has his/ her way to shoot or display the photo + colouring etc... but when you asked people to C&C (comments & thoughts), then there're replies.
If you just mentioned or asked : Film or Digi film?
Then the replies will be difference.

Why it should make this difference? As soon as I scanned film and frame was imported to PS it is digital. From this point doesn't matter what was media wich captured image - you can manipulate properly captured digital image and make tham look very similar to what I've done.

All above just my IMHO and point of view to photography :) No offence mentioned to anyone :)
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby birddog114 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:24 pm

Hlop wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
So the purpose of these photos and this particular thread is not for C&C as stated in your post.
I understood, everyone has his/ her way to shoot or display the photo + colouring etc... but when you asked people to C&C (comments & thoughts), then there're replies.
If you just mentioned or asked : Film or Digi film?
Then the replies will be difference.

Why it should make this difference? As soon as I scanned film and frame was imported to PS it is digital. From this point doesn't matter what was media wich captured image - you can manipulate properly captured digital image and make tham look very similar to what I've done.

All above just my IMHO and point of view to photography :) No offence mentioned to anyone :)


And this is the Image Reviews and Critiques section/ We have the Film section on this board also.

If it's the case, you shouldn't seek the comments and thoughts (C&C).

Coz, good or bad, or ugly or awesome, it's your choice! :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques