Just few ordinary beach-scapes. Any comments? Any thoughts?

Long Reef surfers

Long Reef and Dee Why beaches

Surf Rescue

Few beachscapesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Few beachscapesHi,
Just few ordinary beach-scapes. Any comments? Any thoughts? ![]() Long Reef surfers ![]() Long Reef and Dee Why beaches ![]() Surf Rescue ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
The colours are not real to my taste!
You've gone to the beach? ![]() Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hilop, Truely, they're too dark on my 3 difference monitors. Maybe, I need new replacements monitors or visit my Optometrist for a new set of reading glass. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Yeah, they are dark because I didn't want to make them brighter
![]() ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Well Mikhail, you have horizons straight as far as I can see... and my pet hate in landscapes is tilted horizons, so I think they're great!
![]() I like the contrasty land bits - but the sky seems not to 'match up'... maybe try artificiallly saturating them. The first two, foreground interest is great - it does a good job leading the eye into the picture to give a sense of scale.
Mikhail to be honest with you these aren't my cup of tea. I think the last one could of been improved with the whole "rubber ducky"/zodiak appearing in shot. As CHI mentioned the sky doesn't match the landscape below it.
I don't know what you guys mean by "sky doesn't much to landscape" I have to assure you that it hasn't been modified. All I've done is some levels/curves/saturation. Nothing else.
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
My earlier comments based on these. ![]() ![]() Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
These images look like film scans. Have you been playing with your film camera again Mikhail?
![]() Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Huh! They are film-scans! Well spotted, Steve! ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
The colours are not right and not natural! That why I switched to digital film ![]() ![]() Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
I'm not switching anywhere. I'm still using my D70 but I'm using my film cameras from time to time. As I mentioned above I was not going to make a documentary image of Dee Why and Long Reef and I agreed that colors aren't right. Artist, painting with watercolor for example, can not make natural and right colors - he/she creates new image. And that is what I was trying to do and that what's photography is all about. If I wanted proper colours I could take D70, grey card and result would be just regular dull landscape with natural colours ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
So the purpose of these photos and this particular thread is not for C&C as stated in your post. I understood, everyone has his/ her way to shoot or display the photo + colouring etc... but when you asked people to C&C (comments & thoughts), then there're replies. If you just mentioned or asked : Film or Digi film? Then the replies will be difference. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Why it should make this difference? As soon as I scanned film and frame was imported to PS it is digital. From this point doesn't matter what was media wich captured image - you can manipulate properly captured digital image and make tham look very similar to what I've done. All above just my IMHO and point of view to photography ![]() ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
And this is the Image Reviews and Critiques section/ We have the Film section on this board also. If it's the case, you shouldn't seek the comments and thoughts (C&C). Coz, good or bad, or ugly or awesome, it's your choice! ![]() Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|