Testing Sigma 12-24

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Testing Sigma 12-24

Postby Killakoala on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:14 pm

Went out into the midday sun to test the contrast and colour perception of the Sigma 12-24 and i am proud to announce that the lens performs beautifully. Even without the option of using a polariser, the sky becomes a gorgeuos blue and the pinks and greens in the images below look great. (Taken with D70 and Sigma 12-24mm. Minor cropping, slight saturation increase and sharpening then JPG to web.)

Click on a thumbnail to view a larger image.
Image
Image

The image below just shows the close-up capability at 24mm. (Accidently shot at 1600ISO) The lens allows focusing up to about 30cm so will be useful for photographing my future dinners.

In conclusion, i am very happy with this lens and i am very glad i bought it.

Image
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby stubbsy on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:25 pm

kiallakoala wrote:The lens allows focusing up to about 30cm so will be useful for photographing my future dinners.


Priceless :lol: :lol: :lol: Bet your's won't be steak though :wink:

More on topic - I have the Nikkor purely because of the CP issue. Do you miss this, given your comments and this experience?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Killakoala on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:29 pm

stubbsy wrote:
More on topic - I have the Nikkor purely because of the CP issue. Do you miss this, given your comments and this experience?


So far, no. I havent tried white billowing fluffy clouds with blue sky background yet, but i will eventually. From the pics above, i doubt i will miss it. But for now i am happy with the purchase.

This lens looks like a fisheye on a film camera. I really hope Nikon bring out a full-frame DSLR, then this lens will really shine.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby stubbsy on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:32 pm

Thanks Steve. I guess clouds are the real test (especially for me given my apparent fascination with such shots)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:35 pm

Beautiful colour alright Steve.

It's interesting to see this type of photo taken with a WA - well done. :)
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Killakoala on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:37 pm

There is supposed to be a big storm or two tomorrow so i will try to get a test shot of the clouds. In the mean time here is a pano attempt at 12mm.

Image
Click on the image to view larger

As you can see, 12mm is not ideal for a panorama. The distortion, even with the Sigma, which is less than the Nikkor, is way too much for Pano Factory to handle. :) However the other end at 24mm is ideal but i have no exmples yet.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:47 pm

Steve - I know how great this lens is and have never had reason to use a polariser - great pics by the way :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby big pix on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:49 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Steve - I know how great this lens is and have never had reason to use a polariser - great pics by the way :)


ahhh the chairman......... I need not to say anymore....... ':lol:' :lol: :lol:
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby marcotrov on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:55 pm

Vivid colours steve and once again i made to crave for my Nikkor 12-24. :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby avkomp on Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:59 pm

looks like the lens does the business.
want to get some sort of 12-24 so shots like this provide good insight.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Glen on Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:20 am

Steve, you are making that lens shine
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby birddog114 on Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:19 am

Killakoala,
Great! glad to hear you're happy with it!
Other Tokina 12-24's owners are also happy campers with their purchases and same as Nikkor 12-24DX's owners, I own one of these Nikkor 12-24 as well :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Oneputt on Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:51 am

Steve if you do want a circ -polariser for that lens remember that I have one :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby mudder on Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:18 am

You're going to enjoy that WA lens mate, once you start playing with WA stuff, it becomes addictive... And FF too, so imagine what that'd be like on FF DSLR... I assume it'd work fine on a Nikon film body?
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby MCWB on Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:27 am

Oneputt wrote:Steve if you do want a circ -polariser for that lens remember that I have one

John, not sure if you realise, but the only way you can use a CP on this lens is to screw an 82 mm one into the lens cap holder. The problem is that this will vignette severely at the wide end, probably up to around 16 mm? (Edit: just did a search and found out that you do indeed realise this, my apologies for any offence caused!) I must say, I've always been dubious as to the benefits of using CPs on super wide angle lenses anyway, as the saturation almost always varies across the frame due to the large field of view...

I've loved shooting with this lens, seems you're feeling the same Steve! The only weak point I've found is flare when shooting into the sun. And you're right, after putting the Sigma 12-24 on my F50, I was :shock: just looking through the viewfinder!
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests

cron