Playing with trees

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Playing with trees

Postby atencati on Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:27 pm

plying with trees today...not sure why. Click the links for larger (1000 px wide) images

Image
http://www.sierrafirerescue.com/images/nature/oak_1.png

This one was a long (30sec) exposure using the kit lens, it came out a little softer that I wanted.


Image
http://www.sierrafirerescue.com/images/nature/oak_2.png

This was kit lens, f 11 at 40mm, was trying to capture more detail in the clouds.

thanks

Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby Matt. K on Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:53 pm

atencati
Nice!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby pippin88 on Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:54 pm

As you mentioned, the first one is rather soft, and that really detracts from the image. Maybe it's also the colours, but it's missing something that the second image has.

I really like the second image, it works really well.
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:01 pm

The second photo is very nice BUT I love the first one because I would put this in the art classification and being a designer it has appeal to me.

Just goes to prove that everyones taste varies :lol:

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby mudder on Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:19 pm

G'day,
The second one (oak_2) really does it for me, very nice with an interesting background too...

Cheers,
Mudder.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby coolpix on Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:34 pm

Nice atencati...the second photo is great, i like it very much...nice colours :)
Everything is possible, the impossible just takes longer
User avatar
coolpix
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Toowoomba

Postby Onyx on Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:58 pm

I like trees, so I enjoyed viewing your "experiment" Andy. :)

I often shoot similar (but crappier) abstract or arty-type segments of trees, but never displayed them online for fear of ridicule or be reported to the men with straightjackets...
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby meicw on Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:00 pm

Hi atencati, Very interesting shots. I like them both, but the first one is my fav.

Regards
Meic
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby Greg B on Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:02 pm

Nice work Andy, that first one has a magical quality.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby atencati on Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:52 pm

Surprisingly, the first pic is as shot. I cropped it a bit, but no other changes. I have another where the coast guard flew throught the shot fairly low and left a light streak. Thanks all

Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby wile_E on Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:58 pm

Both very nice shots, atencati - the first one deserves special mention. Like the 'surreal' feeling of it.
User avatar
wile_E
Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby Glen on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:06 pm

Andy, very very nice, especially the first
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests