Betty,
when looking for a compact camera, I had it narrowed down to three:
-Panasonic LX3 (similar to Leica D-Lux 4 which is much more expensive)
-Canon G10
-Nikon P6000
They all have their pro/cons and all of them are in a similar price range. For me, it was a requirement that it did RAW.
See these good reviews below:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... hips.shtmlhttp://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... /lx3.shtmlIn the end, I ended up not getting the Nikon because its RAW format is not supported on the Mac (bad bad Nikon
)
Left me with either the G10 or LX3. The size of the the LX3 is smaller, better lens and a bit wider, 24 instead of 28. The availability of the LX3 (none in Newcastle at the time and hard to get elsewhere) tipped me to get the G10. I needed the camera prior to going on a trip. I didn't need the extra pixels on such a small sensor that the Canon gave me (15Mb instead of 10 Mb for LX3) but in the end, I'm very happy. The camera feels very good in the hand, it is very fast for a P&S and if you don't go for the higher ISO, the quality of the photos is tops. It can be used in full manual
mode and the controls are easy to use.
Also, you can get an underwater housing for the Canon G10, which I may look at getting as I've got some kayaking trips planned for this year.
The P6000 is still a very nice camera, a bit smaller in size then the G10, has the bonus of built in GPS and network connectivity, so don't discount it if you are processing your photos on a PC.
Cheers,
André